Concepts and Definitions - Chapter 9
Learning Objective 9-1:
Typical reasons PMs must shorten overall project duration
Estimated completion date exceeds promised delivery date for new product ("time to
market"), marketing rollout, software go-live, etc.
Schedule slippage during earlier activities
Shifting focus away from budget to schedule, imposing a new project deadline
Considerations when shortening duration
Reducing duration of an activity ("crashing") must follow a logical, systematic approach,
determining which activities to shorten
Crashing an activity reduces the time it requires, but almost always increases its cost, due to
increased resource assignment, overtime, etc.
Learning Objective 9-2:
Options for duration-reduction when there are no resource constraints
(There are resources available "on the bench" or outside the
organization)
Add resources:
o
Assumes you can divide activities efficiently between resources
o
Seldom reduces duration on activities, like software development, that don't divide
easily
Outsource project work
Schedule overtime:
o
Unimaginative last resort [Reflects a planning failure]
o
Undermines morale
o
May involve the cost of a payroll premium
Establish a core (or fully dedicated) team for the project [If you have the resources to do this,
why wouldn't you make it a standard policy?]
Do it quick and dirty, then test it [Then, assuming this strategy works, ask yourself why you
aren't doing this on a regular basis]
Learning Objective 9-3:
Options for duration-reduction when faced with resource constraints
(no additional resources available)
If possible, improve team efficiency [
If this is possible, why wouldn't you do it anyway?
]
Run critical activities in parallel or change FS relationships to SS [
If this is possible, why
wouldn't you do it anyway?
]
Use
Critical-Chain Project Management
(CCPM)
o
Differs from critical path or PERT methodologies