Lisa's
Tort
Claims
Against
Sue
Lisa
suffered
injury
and
damage
to
her
car
due
to
negligence
on
Sue's
part
since
Sue
was
texting
while
driving.
With
such
an
interruption,
which
is
against
the
traffic
rules,
Sue
would
not
recognize
that
Lisa's
car
had
slowed
down.
If
Sue
had
not
been
texting
while
driving,
she
could
have
possibly
been
in
a
position
to
manage
the
situation.
Therefore,
Lisa
has
tort
claims
for
such
negligence
on
Sue
which
caused
Lisa
injuries
due
to
NS
Y
@0
#9:G
(RO
@
(s
Mo
1
o)
R
o
(8
-
Sue's
Defenses
against
Lisa
Sue's
first
defense
against
Lisa's
claims
would
be
that
Lisa
exercised
contributory
negligence
by
slowing
down
her
car
without
any
reasonable
judgment.
As
a
result,
Sue
could claim
that
Lisa
contributed
to
part
of
the
damage
through
the
action.
If
Lisa
had
not
slowed
down,
the
amount
of
damage
that
would
have
occurred
may
have
been
minimal.
Lisa's
comparative
negligence
may
be
the
other
Sue's
point
of
defense
as
different
states
require
that
each
party
repay
for
damages
caused
in
a
similar
event.
If
comparative
negligence
would
be
ascertained,
then
Sue
will
demand
that
some
percentage
of
the
mistake
be
on
Lisa
and
hence
have
the
claim
lessened
on
Sue.
The
claim
for
comparative
negligence
will
work
in
Sue's
favor
if
her
state
is
considerate
of
the
same.
-
Sue's
Tort
Claims
Against
Jim
According
to
the
advert
that
Jim
used
to
promote
t
of
his
car,
there
was
misleading
information
since
not
state
the
correct
number
of
miles
covered
by
th
He
even
added
in
the
advert
that
the
car
was
in
great
shape.
Sue
can
|
smmstivateimmsedeiramdedshcr
through
