Final Draft

Grand Canyon University **We aren't endorsed by this school
Sep 17, 2023
Uploaded by MagistrateHippopotamus8548 on
Niko M DiNunno Grand Canyon University Professor— 4/30/2023 Criminal Trial Final Draft
The judicial system is an ever-changing entity that strives to improve through time. It is structured in such a way that precise actions are taken to ensure that justice is administered equitably and those guilty are held accountable. Criminal trials may differ in their treatment depending on the circumstances, but it is commonly accepted that all defendants have the right to a fair trial. The significance of these processes cannot be emphasized, since they are critical in maintaining the integrity of the justice system. This article will go through each of the procedures that a defendant will go through, emphasizing their importance and explaining the actions that will take place following the trial. Legal action cannot be commenced only on the basis of personal sentiments, according to Cornell Law School. To decide whether a party has standing to sue, the Supreme Court devised a three-part test. This includes establishing whether the plaintiff has truly been injured, whether there is a causal link between the harm and the behavior being challenged in court, and if the injury may be remedied by a favorable ruling. If a person is injured as a result of the actions of another, they have the right to sue that person. This does not, however, ensure that they will win the lawsuit; they must still offer evidence to support their allegation. After establishing that there is a case to proceed with, the court sends a formal notification, known as a notice of trial, to both parties advising them of the trial dates. A notice, according to the United States Department of Justice, is a method of giving both parties with information about legal procedures, such as motions and significant dates, allowing them to gather the essential information. In order to provide this information to both victims and defendants, the department collaborates closely with the federal court system. Parties have time to obtain legal representation and prepare for the lawsuit after receiving it. This helps to kickstart the process, which leads to the following stage, which is the right to counsel.
The Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution guarantees criminal defendants various rights, including the right to a public trial, the right to legal counsel, and the right to be informed of the allegations and evidence against them. When a defendant is unable to afford an attorney, the state will appoint one to assure competent counsel. The Cornell Law website contains useful information on the legal system and how it works. The court may appoint a public defender at little or no expense to the defendant in many circumstances, ensuring that they receive adequate legal representation and understand the allegations and legal procedures. This assures that everyone, regardless of financial conditions, has access to a lawyer. The Arizona Judicial Branch is a government website that offers legal information to the general public and others. Opening statements signify the beginning of the trial process, as the parties submit their arguments to decide the defendant's guilt or innocence. This process can be time-consuming and demanding for both sides, and the court guarantees that the proceedings are accurate. Opening remarks serve to inform the jury about the evidence to be given and what it attempts to show. This allows both parties to submit their evidence to the jury in order for them to reach a fair verdict. It lets each side to deliver a compelling argument and assist the jury see the matter through the eyes of their client. Both parties often give opening comments that set the tone for the whole trial. For a long time, this has been a critical component of trials. Direct examination and cross-examination are two techniques of interrogating witnesses in court, according to the Expert Institute, a website that provides legal knowledge from experts and attorneys. Preparing for these exams before the trial can benefit both parties, as cross- examination can undermine the evidence provided by the opposing counsel. This procedure permits both parties to submit evidence in order to decide if the defendant committed the offense
Page1of 7
Uploaded by MagistrateHippopotamus8548 on