Ban of Tiktok1,.edited

Arizona State University **We aren't endorsed by this school
AE 22
Nov 6, 2023
Uploaded by CoachExplorationWaterBuffalo56 on
Surname 1 Name Instructor Course Date Topic In recent years, there has been a notable surge in attention surrounding TikTok, a widely used social media platform. This heightened focus primarily revolves around apprehensions related to the security of data, privacy concerns, and the platform's influence. Numerous articles have delved into the intricate dimensions of the TikTok discourse, encompassing topics such as cybersecurity, nationalistic sentiments, freedom of expression, and the economic ramifications. In this essay, we will examine these articles and the central arguments they present concerning TikTok and its effects across various spheres. TikTok has come under scrutiny for its handling of issues related to hate speech, harassment, and harmful content. While the platform's community guidelines explicitly prohibit such content, there have been instances where these rules could have been more effectively enforced, leading to criticism. Concerns have also arisen regarding TikTok's potential use for spreading propaganda and radicalizing extremist groups. Furthermore, allegations of censorship have been made, suggesting that specific political and sensitive topics were suppressed on the platform. Questions have been raised about the app's moderation policies, particularly in cases involving content related to political protests and LGBTQ+ issues ( Katie) . Another significant area of concern pertains to privacy and data security. TikTok's data collection practices, particularly concerning minors, have raised alarms among lawmakers and users. There have been apprehensions about how the app
Surname 2 manages user data, prompting calls for investigations and the implementation of stricter regulations. The congressional hearing featuring TikTok CEO Shou Chew and the examination of the company's affiliations with the Chinese Communist Party signal an escalating apprehension within legislative circles concerning the social media platform. Elected officials are likely harboring apprehensions about the potential national security ramifications inherent in the operation of a prominent social media application owned by a Chinese entity. Historically, there have been qualms regarding the gathering of user data and its potential dissemination to the Chinese government (Stanton, 5). The stewardship of user data and issues pertaining to privacy constitute pivotal focal points of contention, as numerous stakeholders harbor concerns about the potential compromise or misuse of sensitive information. Legislators may be advocating for greater transparency and accountability in TikTok's management and safeguarding of user data. Moreover, TikTok's content moderation practices and algorithmic mechanisms have attracted censure for sundry reasons, notably concerning the possible endorsement of deleterious or inappropriate content. Elected representatives may be striving to ensure that TikTok diligently upholds responsible content guidelines and implements safeguards to forestall the dissemination of harmful information. Hutchinson 's (2) scholarly study examines the cybersecurity ramifications associated with Louisiana's implementation of a ban on TikTok across state-owned networks and devices. Apprehensions over the possible influence of the Chinese government and the security of data drove the imposition of the ban. This article critically analyzes the particular provisions of the law and evaluates the financial consequences associated with the complete removal of TikTok from state devices. Prominent scholars, such as Golden Richard and James Lewis, have raised concerns over the efficacy of the restriction in ensuring the protection of personal information. The specialists above evaluate TikTok's operational
Surname 3 activities and undertake an analysis to determine if it presents a significant risk to state- owned networks. The analysis of media coverage surrounding the TikTok ban in India reveals several prominent themes and offers insights into the narrative surrounding this significant event. The media portrayed the ban on TikTok as a part of a broader global struggle against China, emphasizing the support from the United States and its concerns regarding Chinese technology, whereby this portrayal was intended to position India as a member of a global coalition opposing China's influence in the digital domain (Savitz, 5) . The media frequently used terms such as "surveillance" and "espionage" to depict China as a threat not only to India but also to the international community; hence, by underlining global support for India's decision, the media aimed to lend legitimacy to the ban and suggest that it was a necessary response to broader apprehensions about Chinese technology. The media also depicted the TikTok ban as a decisive and strategic move by India, employing phrases like "punish the betrayal by Beijing" and "snooping" to construct a narrative of India taking resolute action against Chinese apps. The choice of language underscored India's determination and commitment to addressing national security concerns. The media framed the ban as a calculated strike against Chinese technology, reinforcing the notion that India was safeguarding its interests through this measure. On the other hand, Kevin St. James, in his article, argues that prohibiting TikTok could potentially have adverse consequences, including the curtailment of freedom of expression, disruptions to small business operations, and implications for the Republican Party's efforts to engage with a younger demographic. This ban is perceived as a potential violation of the First Amendment rights of Americans, and it is recommended that the government exercise caution when regulating mobile applications. TikTok distinguishes itself through its algorithmically-driven content distribution mechanism, enabling the rapid virality
Page1of 5
Uploaded by CoachExplorationWaterBuffalo56 on