Cover sheet for submission of work for assessment SCHOOL : School of Science Program name Master of Cyber Security Program code MC159P18 Office use only School date stamp Course/unit name Information System Risk Management Course/unit code INTE2396 TAFE National Module Unit of Competency (UOC) name TAFE National Module Unit of Competency (UOC) ID Assignment no. 3 rd Interim Report Due date 7 May 2019 Name of lecturer/teacher Professor Asha Rao Campus CITY Class day/time Tuesday: 17:30 - 20:30 Tutor/marker's name STUDENT/S Family name Given name Student number (1) Kpobi Andrew 3076254 (2) Julius Tanya Miriam 3730680 (3) Javaid Humza Bin 3694957 (4) Rajkumar Sabariskumar 3699589 (5) Kisorawong Thammarit 3713376 (6) DECLARATION AND STATEMENT OF AUTHORSHIP 1. I/we hold a copy of this work which can be produced if the original is lost/damaged. 2. This work is my/our original work and no part of it has been copied from any other student's work or from any other source except where due acknowledgement is made. 3. No part of this work has been written for me/us by any other person except where such collaboration has been authorised by the lecturer/teacher concerned. 4. I/we have not previously submitted this work for this or any other course/unit. 5. I/we give permission for this work to be reproduced, communicated, compared and archived for the purpose of detecting plagiarism. 6. I/we give permission for a copy of my/our marked work to be retained by the school for review and comparison, including review by external examiners. I/we understand that: 7. Plagiarism is the presentation of the work, idea or creation of another person as though it is my/our own. It is a form of cheating and is a very serious academic offence that may lead to exclusion from the University. Plagiarised material can be drawn from, and presented in, written, graphic and visual form, including electronic data and oral presentations. Plagiarism occurs when the origin of the material used is not appropriately cited. 8. Plagiarism includes the act of assisting or allowing another person to plagiarise or to copy my/our work. Student signature/s I/we declare that I/we have read and understood the declaration and statement of authorship. (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) Further information relating to the penalties for plagiarism, which range from a notation on your student file to expulsion from the University, is contained in Regulation 6.1.1 Student Discipline and the Plagiarism Policy which are available on the Policies and Procedures website at Copies of this form can be downloaded from the student forms web page at Cover sheet for submission of work for assessment 1111 page 1 of 1
Third Interim Report Assessment: (Due Date 07/05/2019) Team _2__ Total Marks = 30/40 = 3.75/5 1. Complete list of assets identified, along with analysis of each asset (or asset class) (10 marks) Good work done of identifying the assets that were identified. Be careful when you put everything as of high value - that makes it almost impossible to prioritise. However, there are other assets that need to be identified, such as information assets. I know you are doing the new precinct (by the way, you need to state this at the beginning of the report - do not assume the reader remembers!) but you need to think past bricks and mortar. Also, do not confuse goodwill with actual people. Marks gained: 5/10 2. List of Key elements (5 marks) This is very well done, though you seem to have forgotten about referencing! Were these things talked about in pervious interim reports? Then cross-reference from there. Say for example (as per section. Marks gained: 4.5/5 3. Risk Identification. (10 marks) Good list of risks identified, but identification was not really complete, as all components have not been identified. There is a misunderstanding of what a source is - see example in report. Likelihood of the risks was not addressed, nor the severity of the impacts. Most make sense, but some risks seem to be wild claims - need to think more clearly - see comments in report. Marks gained: 7.5/10 4. Approaches used to identify risks and the structure of the rest of the process. (5 marks) Good discussion of approaches used with advantages and disadvantages gives (with references!) Marks allocated: 5/5 5. Project Management report (5 marks) Good write-up, but seeing as it is week 9, I would expect some discussion on how you plan to address the need for improvement in member participation - incentives to participate, and disincentives to overcome non-participation. The percentage distribution needed at the end of the project is one means of getting involvement. Marks Gained: 4/5 6. Standard of Written Communication (5 marks) Well written. Consider cross-referencing sections of report, as that is an easier way forward. Marks Gained: 4/5
Risk Management INTE 2396 3 rd Interim Report Authored by: Team No. 2
Page1of 26
Uploaded by CaptainPonyMaster806 on